Legal Muse

Insert witty tagline here…

Fantastic

with 3 comments

“Finally, if the language of the contract is to be construed as broadly as defendant urges to encompass the presence of poltergeists in the house, it cannot be said that she has delivered the premises “vacant” in accordance with her obligation under the provisions of the contract rider.”

169 A.D.2d 254, 572 N.Y.S.2d 672
Advertisements

Written by DMN

November 18, 2008 at 1:23 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. well, i don’t know about anyone else, but i certainly would expect my money back if the house was haunted.

    Dave

    November 18, 2008 at 3:32 pm

  2. It’s just funny that they are assuming the actual existence!

    openfire06

    November 18, 2008 at 8:06 pm

  3. i loved that!!! Almost as much as I loved the discussion about who was the “actual” biological birth parent!

    sprinkles (veto)

    November 26, 2008 at 8:20 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: