Fantastic
“Finally, if the language of the contract is to be construed as broadly as defendant urges to encompass the presence of poltergeists in the house, it cannot be said that she has delivered the premises “vacant” in accordance with her obligation under the provisions of the contract rider.”
169 A.D.2d 254, 572 N.Y.S.2d 672
well, i don’t know about anyone else, but i certainly would expect my money back if the house was haunted.
Dave
November 18, 2008 at 3:32 pm
It’s just funny that they are assuming the actual existence!
openfire06
November 18, 2008 at 8:06 pm
i loved that!!! Almost as much as I loved the discussion about who was the “actual” biological birth parent!
sprinkles (veto)
November 26, 2008 at 8:20 pm